Wow. It took me 3 days to get through this (it was a busy weekend), but it was well worth the read. It would have been much easier to just say "This dude is a liar and an idiot." but I believe your approach is way better.
I like to click the linked studies and at least pretend like I'm reading through them, so I did that with one of the references from the source article only to be met with a bad link. Then you explain that it is the original link from the article and it doesn't actually exist. Do people just assume you won't check things and verify what they write?
Wow. It took me 3 days to get through this (it was a busy weekend), but it was well worth the read. It would have been much easier to just say "This dude is a liar and an idiot." but I believe your approach is way better.
I like to click the linked studies and at least pretend like I'm reading through them, so I did that with one of the references from the source article only to be met with a bad link. Then you explain that it is the original link from the article and it doesn't actually exist. Do people just assume you won't check things and verify what they write?