Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Baxter Bentley's avatar

Sometimes I'm perplexed by scientists who cherry pick studies or misread them to suit their prejudices. Sometimes I am not.

I understand the motivation for the nutrition policy analysts at the USDA, FDA, CDC, and NIH who defend seed oils. Government agencies have incredibly long institutional memories. Employees work there for decades, and any very influential ones will have fought battles to change things that have contributed to the status quo. This makes them reluctant to change their view, and their level of influence has a collateral impact on others at the institution. Plus, there's a disdain for newcomers or outsiders who dissent but haven't fought the battles, the contempt for laymen who contest their opinions, and the professional clout they gain from influencing industry & academia.

I can also understand the motivation behind academic defenders of seed oils. They face many of the same institutional forces that gov't nutrition policy analysts face. Also, they frequently collaborate with gov't policy analysts, so there's a question of loyalty (which creates a feedback loop with their partners in government).

I can also understand the motivation for people who work with medical institutions. They face all of the above factors, plus they use government recommendations so that they avoid opening windows of professional liability, like IT professionals who default to Microsoft, IBM, or Oracle.

And, of course, everyone knows the entrenched interests involved in product development in the food industry.

I'm not saying any of this is good, just that I understand the motivations.

Nevertheless, plenty of independent nutritional scientists work in fields much less encumbered by the factors that influence gov't, academia, medical instutions, and the food industry. They're persuing careers in food & nutrition media, public speaking, nutritional workshops, health coaching, policy advocary, etc.

What is their motivation for misreading & cherrypicking studies to suit their prejudices? Is it just that they place so much blind faith in the network of information that comes out of gov't, academia, and medical institutions? Or are they just stupid?

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

'seed oils used to make ultra processed junk food'

Is that really the largest contribution to diet? What about people who go through a lot of salad dressing, commercial or homemade, which is made with seed oil? That seems pretty substantial.

Are french fries considered ultra processed?

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts